Final Project Brief Description
Greetings folks. In response to Tom's request for abrief description of our final projects for the class, I thought I would start this discussion to get things going.
Read more…You need to be a member of Alaska Council for the Social Studies to add comments!
Comments are closed.
Greetings folks. In response to Tom's request for abrief description of our final projects for the class, I thought I would start this discussion to get things going.
Read more…While Worster's writing is full of many ideas, one central feature of his work is the location of the origins of environmental degradation in capitalist world-views and modes of production that are as alive in the present as they have been in the past. This admittedly Marxist and materialist interpretation runs counter to most historical narratives produced 'these days.' What responses do you have for this point of view? Worster Toward.pdf
Read more…How might you define "nature?" Assuming the goal of Environmental history (and this is a good assumption) is to re-place nature (or place) into our historical narratives, just what is "nature?" Cronon Nature.pdf
Read more…
Comments
The Alaska Humanities Forum has a good website on AK History which many of you are probably aware. Lots of good information and links, although the content could be better organized. The Russian Reader was where I found the primary sources used in this lesson.
http://www.akhistorycourse.org/
This site is a treasure trove of primary sources regarding the Gold Rush and that time period. Most of the materials I used were found under "Discovery of Gold" and "Our Legacy", both of which have sections pertaining to the effects of the Gold Rush on Native Alaskans.
http://www.eed.state.ak.us/temp_lam_pages/library/goldrush/midmain.htm
Race & Civil Rights in education is a classic example. While we are still quite a ways away from true equality, most of the barriers of de jure (officially, legally sanctioned) segregation & discrimination have been removed with the modern interpretation of the 14th Amendment & implementation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 & the Voting Rights Act of 1965. In education that means explicit segregation based on race is illegal, but that leaves de facto segregation & discrimination in place, e.g. schools segregated not by policy but by the demographics of the neighborhood. Historically when we have tried to address de facto segregation & discrimination—busing in Boston in the 1970s or Affirmative Action—things have gotten very complicated (and often quite ugly & even violent).
I wonder if we are at this point with women’s rights—have we moved from the realm of de jure discrimination to de facto discrimination? Have we moved from the egregious examples of discrimination (which one of my students refers to as “WTF discrimination”) to more subtle examples? Violations of the Civil Rights of women were more blatant before the Equal Pay Act, the Civil Rights Act, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act & the Family & Medical Leave Act enhanced our interpretation & enforcement of the 14th Amendment.
I consider these acts essential to the progress we have made on Civil Rights & full equality (and I would advocate we go even further on these issues) but John’s question is valid: How do we balance the rights of a worker (female or otherwise) against the rights of an employer? There are still egregious examples of discrimination, but I would argue that the vast majority fall into more subtle categories. And in dealing with the more subtle instances, sometimes in providing Equal Protection for one group, we violate Equal Protection for another. Doing so is a “no brainer” when talking about slavery or segregation in the receding past (Who would argue today slave owners deserved Equal Protection? But that is what they did when abolition was on the table.) John’s example shows how much more difficult these debates on 14th Amendment issues are after significant progress has been achieved.
And from the perspective of a small business owner, living on the bare margins of profitability (or even a larger business just interested in maximizing efficiency), maximizing the number of employee tasks completed in a week/month/year and minimizing the the amount of training/retraining/learning hours that you have to pay when hiring each employee is not necessarily bigotry, it is profit and mathematics...
If corporations were rewarded for things other than quarterly profit, this might have changed a lot faster than it has been. But the system is designed to maximize economic profit and ignore all "externalized" social costs...
I do agree with Craig. I found it rather shocking that pregnancy was seen as a disease. I could not believe it. Pregnancy is the last thing that I would label as a disease. I was wondering what some of the women in the class who had children thought about that comment.
I am a visual learner and last class was wonderful with the PowerPoint. There were some wonderful pictures and information. Like Patricia said, I thought that it was too ‘lecture heavy’. It is very hard for me to listen to a lecture heavy internet class. I start to drift off and do other things or space out. I need interaction and peer involvement. She had some wonderful statements and ideas, but I wish I knew what some of you were thinking. I know the slide about a proper housewife, I would have loved to hear some more comments from the class.
In her defensive though, she may not have know about the ways in which we do communicate in the course, phones un-muted, big screen chat, etc. I hope that there will be more conversation next class :)
Some of this seems to arise out of “difference feminism” & the goal of defining what is essential about being a woman. Certainly the cultural ideas of women being ill-suited for fighting in combat or initiating sexual contact (two rather interesting examples from the readings) are problematic & outmoded, as are the old assumptions of female athletic ability & interest (on my mind with the Final Four playing out on TV). But pregnancy clearly defines the differences between a man & a woman, and if any difference is going to find its way into the law books it would have to be pregnancy. This is very important for the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which guarantees equal protection before the law (either to ones advantage or disadvantage) for “similarly circumstanced” individuals & groups. Pregnancy would be an example of how & when a person is not similarly circumstanced, therefore, defining when women would warrant special treatment before the law, much as a person suffering from a disease or disability would.